Texas Governor Greg Abbott has vetoed Senate Bill 3 (SB 3), which would have banned all consumable hemp-derived THC products—including popular delta-8 and delta-9 THC gummies and beverages. Abbott instead urged lawmakers to craft balanced regulations akin to alcohol oversight during a special July legislative session.
SB 3 passed swiftly through the state legislature, targeting products with any intoxicating cannabinoids. The bill would’ve made manufacture, distribution, and possession of such items a criminal offense, disrupting a Texas hemp market valued at roughly $8 billion and supported by over 8,500 retailers.
Abbott described the bill as “well-intentioned,” yet likely unconstitutional and legally vulnerable—a view supported by leading industry voices such as the Texas Hemp Business Council. These stakeholders now pivot toward regulatory frameworks involving age restrictions (21+), testing mandates, local government control, and industry oversight.
Retailers expressed relief. Owners of smoke shops and CBD stores noted THC products make up to 60% of sales, particularly in small, family-run businesses that might otherwise have been shuttered. One Conroe-based shop owner emphasized that a ban would have “closed” the dream for many local entrepreneurs.
The political divide remains clear: Lt. Governor Dan Patrick, a key proponent of SB 3, lamented Abbott’s veto, warning that “dangerous THC products” put minors and communities at risk. He claimed the bill had majority Republican support and backing from pediatric groups and state medical associations.
Public health experts say a middle path makes sense; outright prohibition could push consumers into unregulated black markets, while a regulatory model ensures accountability. Abbott’s call for a special session beginning July 21 aims to deliver a framework balancing access, safety, and economic interests.
Looking ahead, Texas lawmakers may borrow elements from alcohol regulation—like age limits, child-resistant packaging, and retail licensing—while also addressing product testing, potency caps, and marketing oversight. Successful reform here might influence other Southern or conservative states exploring hemp-derived THC control.
For consumers, this development means continued access to popular THC products under regulated conditions. For industry players, it signals both relief and the challenge of navigating a new regulatory landscape. For public health advocates, it marks an opportunity to implement responsible, data-informed policies instead of quick bans, potentially setting a precedent for states balancing freedom and oversight in the hemp market.
Source: Houston Chronicle
